Reviewer #2 speaks out after being "canceled" on Twitter
1 min read
Wishing to remain anonymous, the tenured professor commonly known as "Reviewer #2" penned an open letter Friday aimed squarely at that 3rd-year grad student who finally got the courage to submit a first-author paper.
"I really enjoyed your approach. I just can't believe you didn't cite my previous work that obviously inspired it." he said, while sipping port wine in his candle-lit study.
After more ambiguous ranting that we struggled to pull meaning from, he continued:
"I don't even have a Twitter account, but that didn't stop you and your mob from publicly chastising me for suggesting major revisions including using a different color scheme on your trend lines."
When we contacted Reviewer #2 to comment on this unfair treatment, he added:
"Reviewer #1 has a history of being too soft and I worry about upholding the rigorous standards of science that consistently abused me when I was in training."
"And we all know Reviewer #3 just wants to leave early to catch happy hour at the corner bar. So I'm forced to be the bad guy again and again."
Also in Life after the PhD - Finishing grad school and what's on the other side
Think you only have time to read text books in grad school? That’s what I thought too. You have more time than you think. Your future self will tell you so (trust me). The 5-15 hours and $8-$35 it will take you to read any of these books will pay itself back in time and earnings many-fold throughout your student life and in your first job offer after graduation. Invest in yourself and reap the benefits later.
It can seem like an impossible task: tediously reading dry academic research articles, following citations in never-ending circles to somehow come away with a structured literature review of the field. Two papers down and you’re already falling asleep. It’s a deeply unsettling feeling of hopelessness that I once felt as well. Here's what I did to overcome it.